I personally don't care if the titles (as you explained below) are links or not. I personally have only wanted the tiddler titles to be links once, when I wanted to copy a tiddler between two wikis and needed the link so I could drag it.
My personal best guess as to why there is an option is because someone wanted them to be links and someone didn't. The easiest way to resolve the disagreement was add an option in tiddlywiki. Just to keep the confusion going ;-) I want to like CamelCase but I don't. Of course, I don't have to use it since we have [[ and ]]. On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 3:05:48 PM UTC-4, Mat wrote: > > Ouch thread going havoc > > NO - I'm NOT talking about camelcase autolinking (which I really dislike) > > I'm talking about this: > > > > > Ok, so to sum up it seems people don't have any particular arguments *against > *titles as links. > > Danielo mentions possible *confusion *for users, presumably that clicking > it doesn't lead anywhere, but I frankly thing few would be confused by > this. (Particularly if the title was not styled as a link). AND, clicking > the title link *does *do something; It scrolls the window so the tiddler > is at screen top if it wasn't there before! > > As noted, the other advantage is when copying tiddlers between TWs. This > is perhaps not needed all that often BUT in public TWs, I find a tiddler > every now and then that I want to copy and where the link simplifies. > > Anyway, thanks everyone for the input. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3c136284-bada-4257-afaa-91257d53b40e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
