Ciao PMario @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> All I am asking is *whether existing plugins could be included* in one >> ... >> > > Technically it's possible. I need to think about it. ... > > >> Is this a headache :-). >> > > Kind of. ... TW plugins can have a "license". In most cases they are very > flexible. MIT or BSD. So they can be easily re-distributed. But that's not > always the case. ... >
Right. That was my thought too. Its partly why I held back so much on this. Even though I do think "bundling" is a very good practical idea, but it needs to include plugins to be really useful, IMO. We need to be able to move stuff around more easily IMO. But the "sacrosanct" nature of plugins matters. One needs respect authors. > The second thing is, that plugins can be updated, independently of any > content. > Right and that is BOTH a benefit & a downside. For functional TW's its sometimes better NOT to have the latest version. It does happen that something is working fine and the author adds something that then breaks things. I guess, overall, my interest in bundles is knowing its included plugins work WELL ENOUGH. I think playing with bundles (which you have skill for, and I don't), is ALSO interesting for issues it brings up. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3db5f1cf-d551-4125-a03f-caf679a12546%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
