Sorry again; I don't want the result *in* js (because I don't know js). I'm just guessing it should be "simple" to apply the resulting filter output value to the emptyValue/value variables in a similar way that is it applied to the name variable. I guess the name variable gets directly *set* with the value of the filter output, whereas something like this;
emptyValue="the filter result is %" ...would require first snooping up the % character and then replace it. 2. The variable isn't available until after the filter has 'run' > Yes, but the filter has always been run before *either *of the output variants are relevant... so my point is just that it might be possible to access this filter result in the output. I could see making a request for an additional <$set> output option, e.g. > 'format="the count was %s"' > What do you mean with "format"? How would it differ from using "value". <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a0316e43-df6e-4c2f-93d0-e90e4001379f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
