It was on an almost empty TiddlyWiki datafolder mounted in TiddlyServer (which currently uses $:/core/save/all), so just a stock TiddlyWiki with hardly anything in it. I didn't think about it that I was using an almost empty TiddlyWiki or I would have mentioned it! :)
Windows 7 64 Bit / Chrome current stable. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:10 PM, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Arlen, > > What is your setup? Nodejs or stand-alone? Which browser, what OS, and > what kind of machine. I'm thinking that if you can zip through these in 4 > seconds that you might need to load the first list filter some more. > > Mark > > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 4:44:45 PM UTC-7, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> Brilliant!!! Here is my test and result >> >> <<now "mm:0ss">> <-- 41:23 >>> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20"> >>> <$list filter="[all[tiddlers+shadows]]"> >>> <$list filter="[<currentTiddler>has[text]]"> </$list> >>> </$list> >>> </$list> >>> <<now "mm:0ss">> <-- 41:27 (4 seconds) >>> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20"> >>> <$list filter="[all[tiddlers+shadows]]"> >>> <$list filter="[is[current]has[text]]"> </$list> >>> </$list> >>> </$list> >>> <<now "mm:0ss">> <-- 41:31 (4 seconds) >> >> >> Apparently no significant difference. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:59 PM, @TiddlyTweeter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> WHOAH! Is that a proto Test Suite? >>> >>> On Monday, 26 June 2017 22:15:13 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: >>>> >>>> My informal test, running the code below on TiddlyWiki.com, suggests >>>> that <currentTiddler> may be twice as fast as is[current]. Minutes and >>>> seconds are posted at the top and bottom of the process loop for >>>> comparison. >>>> >>>> <<now "mm:0ss">> >>>> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20"> >>>> <$list filter="[all[tiddlers+shadows]]"> >>>> <$list filter="[<currentTiddler>has[text]]"> >>>> .</$list> >>>> </$list> >>>> </$list> >>>> <<now "mm:0ss">> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:31:32 AM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I was creating some template tiddlers when I suddenly discovered >>>>> myself using <currentTiddler> a lot within list widgets. >>>>> >>>>> This is what was natural for me at that moment, but I just remembered >>>>> that I before I normally use the filter operator [is[current]] or >>>>> [all[current]] and the doubt appeared. Which one has better performance? >>>>> Using the <currentTiddler> variable or the [is[current]] filter operator. >>>>> >>>>> For me makes sense that just accessing a variable is much more >>>>> performant than just filtering all the tiddlers to see which one is the >>>>> current one. One usage example is as follows: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <$list filter="[<currentTiddler>has[text]]"> >>>>> Text if the field exists >>>>> </$list> >>>>> <$list filter="[<currentTiddler>!has[text]]"> >>>>> Text if the field does not exist >>>>> </$list> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe there are situations where you want to use the filter version >>>>> instead of the variable, but since both depend on the value of the current >>>>> tiddler variable, I can't think of any situation like this. >>>>> >>>>> Any reasoning about this is very welcome. If currentTiddler is more >>>>> performant for this base cases, I think it should be included as some part >>>>> of good practices or something like this. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >>> gid/tiddlywiki/1dbc1104-1500-4409-a34b-401384cfcef6%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1dbc1104-1500-4409-a34b-401384cfcef6%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/tiddlywiki/70bd2ecd-1c52-4f06-a46d-bedf1d8a5371%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/70bd2ecd-1c52-4f06-a46d-bedf1d8a5371%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAJ1vdSSMUNSpX1DCv0UUYW5qOnAU4y_EgEM6_xxgNUPMtuATkA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
