On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 1:19:35 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > > I am aware there is a regexp operator, but can it RETURN its exact match > for processing, or is it what it looks like: a match with something IN a > field it adds to a list to display but then the match itself is discarded? > > Timely. I was looking to do this yesterday. No, I didn't find a solution either. What's happening is, TW5 is using the regexp op to filter in-or-out the tiddler during that run, not the matched string. Be a nice addition to have at some point, though.
*rexpexps* -- matches the specified string of text and //returns it//. However, I'm not sure there would be enough people voting it up - but I could be wrong. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e3d9135c-069b-4d99-beca-02b065a4b257%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
