Jed, I should have guessed you had a strategy, thanks for your work and I am happy to review later versions.
Regards Tony On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 1:04:54 AM UTC+11, Jed Carty wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback! > > Tony, > > I need to put in an interface for editing existing expenses, or at least > deleting them. I want to avoid having a very simple way to modify them so > that I don't accidentally delete something later but after using it a bit I > agree that it needs some way to do it. > > For having different fields and things (like 'To' in place of 'Person') I > am hopefully going to finish implementing a way to create other templates > that can work with the same system. That would allow you to have any fields > you like for an expense and have different types in the same wiki if you > wish. That covers some of your points about extras too. I am working on a > system to let me have pictures or electronic receipts connected as well. I > have most of it worked out so hopefully that will be coming soon. This > would probably be the way that the system would be generalised to support > other things. Once I get the expenses part of this worked out I am hoping > to combine it with the invoice creator I made so it can be a more complete > system. > > TiddlyTweeter, > > That is a good list of features, and most of it should be pretty straight > forward. I may just take that and use it as my shorter term road map. I > have an old widget I made for auto-incrementing that I am hoping to include > with this, but it may be a bit more complex than just incrementing a number > each time you make a new report because I want to be able to go back and > make custom reports from the past and that would disrupt a sequential > naming scheme. I may be able to get around this by using prefixes based off > of the filters used to create the reports and an incrementing number for > each unique set of prefixes. I have run into the problem of formatting > numbers often enough that I think a pull request for the view widget that > lets you define numeric formats is a good idea. > I like your suggestion for data entry, it would almost require that > individual items be editable but I think that my concerns about that are > small compared to the usability improvements from this. > > And for settings, I am trying to make it easy to change templates used and > hopefully the templates will make it easy to add or hide fields as desired. > I need to make some more templates and see how it goes. > > As a node, I am dyslexic and changes in text or background colours and > styles makes text a bit hard for me to read. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7333609a-6b37-49e0-912f-568e8a80a6ec%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
