Ciao TonyM My last post was probably not as clear as it could have been. I was really interested in it in FINAL outcomes. That is nothing to do with code and nothing directly to do with neat procedures people invented in TW (even though silently enabling).
I was wanting to focus attention on final *usage aims*. Like "Writing Screenplays", "Posting Tweets" or "Documenting Grannie's History". In other words WHAT one uses TiddlyWiki FOR. My point was that sometimes here we overlook the bleeding obvious. Though I have NO "should" about what folk do, I just think that a lot of the time here we make it hard for FINAL end-users to grasp how much is available that will more than adequately fit their limited, doable utilitarian needs. I'm not sure what the solution is. I think there is a MISSING PIECE. Possibly a better SHOWCASE of complete wikis so more people can directly see what can be done? Not sure? Best wishes Josiah TonyM wrote: > > Perhaps you did not notice yet but on your comment; > > *So much discussion here is on "technical means" not "final aims/ends" I > think we in in danger of excluding some kinds of user who is looking at TW > to achieve exactly that issue about posterity.* > > I some ways this is my key focus, > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0835b601-26b0-40c7-a61b-da63a62b39c5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
