Could you store the index to a data tiddler so that it could be restored without rebuilding the index the next time the TW is loaded?
-- Mark On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 11:11:47 AM UTC-8, Rob Hoelz wrote: > > I'm glad you find it useful! BTW, if you have the time and desire, > contributions (such as automatically building the index in the background > if it's out of date) are most welcome - I have a whole list of ideas for > improvement if you're interested. > > Just to be clear - the index *does *update in the background if it's been > built, so that new tiddlers or changes to existing tiddlers are reflected > in the index. It just doesn't save to local storage automatically. > > There is definitely room for more types of searches in TiddlyWiki - but I > agree with Mark in that a fast and simple search serves as a pretty good > default. > > -Rob > > On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 10:42:38 AM UTC-6, Diego Mesa wrote: >> >> ah - disregard - I see you already answered in the README. Sorry :l >> >> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 10:41:44 AM UTC-6, Diego Mesa wrote: >>> >>> By the way, does the index rebuild itself every so often, or do I need >>> to rebuild it? >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 10:40:16 AM UTC-6, Diego Mesa wrote: >>>> >>>> Cool plugin Rob! Thanks for this. I think in a personal knowledge base >>>> like TW, search should definitely be a first-class part of the TW core. >>>> I'd >>>> love to see something like fuzzy matching implemented as well: >>>> >>>> http://fusejs.io/ >>>> >>>> Thanks for the plugin! >>>> >>>> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 10:06:54 AM UTC-6, Rob Hoelz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The ordering is alphabetical by title - I'm sure there are plugins >>>>> available that will add other search tabs with other orderings (eg. I >>>>> often >>>>> find myself wanting things ordered by modification date in reverse >>>>> chronilogical order). I implemented a full text search plugin that >>>>> orders >>>>> results by relevance: https://hoelz.ro/files/fts.html >>>>> >>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 9:37:09 AM UTC-6, Diego Mesa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the logic behind the *ordering* of search results? Wouldnt >>>>>> it make sense to order them by Edit/Levenshtein distance: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edit_distance >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cb853a84-8eef-4041-991c-723ae9e503cb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
