Josiah, Of course we can walk and chew gum at the same time and whilst I supoort complete solutions that answer peoples needs I also understand the limitations of editions. Many have inspired me, many have being a source of code and ideas but I do not use a single one everyday.
I have invested a lot to build my bespoke solution and I do not expect anyone to make the commitment, I know that the way I use it is not the way to increase adoption. But I am not sure the direction you are going is the whole story. To me it is the gap between what tiddlywiki can do and the effort to do it. I speak from considerable expirence that the key in my view is we need to bring tiddlywikis features forward and exposed to novice users. It is hard me to put the details of my argument because it is all about the details. yet also about retaining and expanding its pgilosophy and capabilities Regardless of If get my ideas understood by this community I plan to deliver such improvements myself. Though some colaboration would be nice. Examples include simpler sopgisticated use of fields generic queue managment features simple note taking in a world of complexity and much more yours sincerly tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b03ec76a-e5fe-401f-a80e-05dce53c3014%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
