On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 4:31:01 AM UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > I'm more worried about transclusions, since they would be used for > insertion of _canonical_uri images. It's the images and the supporting > tiddlers that would be hived off. >
The code would be similar to the link-widget detection, which has to check the parsetree for every tiddler. Since this calculation is "expensive", the results are cached internally, to speed up further searches. So detecting the transclusion-widget would result in similar code, which is relatively low level. But the code is nicely separated, so it should be doable. Link detection can be found in wiki.js <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/blob/9b2d9169464754a3fddfba0efd098724dbf649d1/core/modules/wiki.js#L398-L440> -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f03531f0-7700-412c-a3a6-77d974b6f14d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
