Furicle,

The following is still open for discussion, my thoughts?


   - Any additional wiki or website would primarily be about the process of 
   collecting and developing content to be formally posted elsewhere. No in 
   itself a comprehensive wiki
   - Perhaps a rule should be this (Site/WIki/Project)  is not where you 
   ask for solutions, search if you want, but use official doco and Google 
   Groups to ask questions. 
   - It should be dripping with links and references to the Formal and 
   tried documentation. Google Groups is not (always) doing this.
   - It should reference discussions and plugins mentioned in Google 
   Groups, TiddlyWiki.com  does not do this.
   - It could stand along side the other platforms for example when users 
   curate and extract content from Google Groups and place it in preparation 
   for examples to place in the doco,
   - It could eliminate superseded content, and chit chat and of topic 
   items from some discussions (Neither Google Groups or TiddlyWiki.com do 
   this)
   - However much will be refined and rather than discard what we do not 
   use it may as well document other contributions.
   - If someone works through a long Goggle Groups Discussion they could 
   post a link to a summary in the proposed project repositories, and where 
   the formal documents are.
   

Re: Git/Git Hub, Where do I start? Can you imagine someone naive about it?, 
there is a lot of lingo, and very little documentation targeting the 
tiddlywiki use of Git/Hub for newbies. 
I am a ICT professional of 30 years who has not used it, what about the 
millennial or mum/dad user? I do not even understand the flow to critique 
it. These are all barriers to wholesale adoption/contribution. 
Lets adequately document it for newbies or just leave it to select people.

Whilst the discussed solution may stand alone and have its own value, it's 
primary purpose is to collate and feed documentation and training / 
learning materials.

Regards
Tony


On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 14:03:55 UTC+11, Furicle wrote:
>
> Perhaps the first document that needs to be created is the one detailing 
> how to help with the documentation  :-)
>
> But creating a different wiki to document this one seems humorous, if 
> nothing else...
>
> Tony, can you be more specific about your issues with Git/Github?  Do you 
> think the flow won't work? or are there specific steps that need to be 
> clearer?
>
> And do you see this as a 'stand alone' wiki or will it end up as part of 
> tiddlywiki.com ?
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/17620faa-f4d6-4a49-a37a-88a726321d0b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to