Time will tell. It's my experience that hasty decisions about syntax can make language design tougher later on, so I'm not inclined to jump the gun on brevity options. One of the tough things about filters, in particular, is that the multi-run syntax should be supported in the future. That has some weird implications.
It wouldn't be unreasonable to have an arraylinks function, though. On Monday, 18 December 2017 22:19:46 UTC-6, Mat wrote: > > (= arraystring([tag[Expenses]], "[[", "]] [[", "]]") >> > > A bit cumbersome. > Maybe (= array*links*([tag[Expenses]]) =) > > > ...and, btw, given how filters are delimited with outer square brackets, > just maybe parentheses could be omitted for filters? > > (= arraylinks*[*tag[Expenses]*]* =) > > (= sum*[*tag[Expenses]get[value]*]* =) > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/89b2265c-0e89-4f6b-bbca-5e50e7dc5ad5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
