Honestly, stuff like that is why I'm making the formula widget.  TiddlyWiki 
doesn't do nested expressions, formula does.  The only missing piece is a 
transclude function accepting a string (or a family of these...).

On Saturday, 30 December 2017 16:46:54 UTC-6, coda coder wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 4:28:12 PM UTC-6, Evan Balster wrote:
>>
>> Oh, wait, sorry, shoot.  That won't work at all, it'll just expand to the 
>> string of the transclusion.
>>
>
> Right.  And why I said (wished) $if accepting a TextReference (like state 
> does for $reveal).  I'm hinting that if a preparse returned you something 
> with !! then you could support them (and then the wikification would work - 
> right?)
>
> But it's probably a step too far (plus you'd have the only widget that 
> supported both on the entire planet)  ;)  Too confusing is my guess.
>
>
>
>> Yeah, you're going to have to set another variable, or use <$tiddler> or 
>> something.
>>
>> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 16:27:12 UTC-6, Evan Balster wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, so this is a classic case of "TiddlyWiki macro expansion is 
>>> confusing as heck".  You can't put a <<macro>> (or variable) inside a 
>>> {{transclusion}}, either in WikiText or in attributes.  You *can* 
>>> expand specific variables inside macros, but it uses a dollar sign syntax.
>>>
>>> In your case, just move the curly braces to be inside the macro (or 
>>> another new macro).
>>>
>>> <$if not value=<<get-note-state>> match="show">
>>>
>>> \define get-note-state() 
>>> {{$:/temp/state/$(currentTiddler)$-$(_notetype)$-$(unique)$}}
>>>
>>> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 15:44:14 UTC-6, coda coder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Edited for typos:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Evan... I did wonder about that, too.  So, do you think this 
>>>> should work? (I'm trying to keep to a minimum the alien code you need to 
>>>> digest :)
>>>>
>>>> Original:
>>>> <$reveal type="nomatch" state=<<get-authornote-state>> text="show">
>>>>
>>>> $if:
>>>> <$if not value={{<<get-note-state>>}} match="show">
>>>>
>>>> \define get-note-state() 
>>>> $:/temp/state/$(currentTiddler)$-$(_notetype)$-$(unique)$
>>>>
>>>> LOL... I think I *am* going to need another var :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 3:32:05 PM UTC-6, Evan Balster wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Coda —
>>>>>
>>>>> The substitution in your example there *should* work fine, so I 
>>>>> suspect the trouble lies elsewhere.  For example, this works:
>>>>>
>>>>> \define testSearchBar(field)
>>>>> <$if value={{$:/temp/search!!$field$}} match="yes">
>>>>> Search is "yes"
>>>>> </$if>
>>>>> \end
>>>>>
>>>>> <<testSearchBar text>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember that a macro can't define *only* the opening tag of a 
>>>>> widget; it needs to define the content and closing tag as well...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 15:24:20 UTC-6, coda coder wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Evan...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:54:54 PM UTC-6, Evan Balster wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As compared with the closely-related *$reveal* widget, conditions 
>>>>>>> are simpler, behave more like *$list*, and can be executed as a 
>>>>>>> chain.  They don't retain contents or animate, and can be based on 
>>>>>>> variables, filtered or transcluded attributes rather than just state 
>>>>>>> tiddlers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm no expert but, I think there's a reason that Jeremy chose to use 
>>>>>> a TextReference for use by the state attribute of the $reveal widget.  
>>>>>> When 
>>>>>> I just tried to switch one out for the $if widget, I hit a snag:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <$reveal type="match" state="someTiddler!!$switch$" text="yes">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that the field part of the reference is supplied as a parameter 
>>>>>> to the outer macro wherein this line occurs.  I don't see a way to 
>>>>>> directly 
>>>>>> replace the above using the $if widget -- the following of course does 
>>>>>> not 
>>>>>> work:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <$if value={{$:/.rgt/bk/author-data!!$switch$}} match="yes">
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think it possible to make TextReferences work with $if?  
>>>>>> Otherwise, the neater and much more readable $if widget would need a 
>>>>>> needless variable ($wikify?) to prepare the transclusion value for its 
>>>>>> use 
>>>>>> by $if (I think).  Right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope that made sense...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Coda
>>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7135939f-9d97-4414-af78-3ce80a65e668%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to