> I wanted to have a discussion first before making a pull request. It is > painfully easy to convert the existing sort filter to acquire this > behavior. Case being that, should we have it as a new filter, or modify the > existing sort. Right now I feel like we ll have to add it as a new filter, > as modifying existing sort might break the work flow of those who depended > on the current way of its behavior. If somebody tells me different, Either > way I would be happy to oblige. > > Yes, as I understood it, this is how it is - to assure compatibility for those filters you appear to need to add yours as a new one
I would like to have both - compatibility and your new filter, that's why I personally don't bother if it's almost the same as the original sort filter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6d6a3d73-e267-449e-afd7-f43ea8b91f2d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
