Steve, Mark.S, TonyM, BTC & all.

Returning to the theme. I'm sure Pandoc to TW would be a great plus to ease 
migration to TW. In terms of conversion TWC & TW5 variants would be 
awesome. TWC is still live and significant.

My concern about it is NOT Pandoc to TW, its TW to Pandoc. BOTH ways 
conversion is important for Pandoc.

I'm not fully convinced its workable. TW differs from most Pandoc formats 
in having a dynamism that is significant to looks and function in a way 
most Pandoc formats don't have. Pandoc is largely pretty static document 

TW can modify its own form so I'm kinda AS interested in what Pandoc can do 
with TW to get it into other formats as I am the other way round. I'm not 
yet convinced that it might not be a disappointing experience TW -> Other.

I guess it would be some kinda gateway to greater  uptake to TW. But I do 
think its a bit more complicated than it might look on first take. That's 
in addition to the Haskell hassle.

Best wishes

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to