Steve, Mark.S, TonyM, BTC & all. Returning to the theme. I'm sure Pandoc to TW would be a great plus to ease migration to TW. In terms of conversion TWC & TW5 variants would be awesome. TWC is still live and significant.
My concern about it is NOT Pandoc to TW, its TW to Pandoc. BOTH ways conversion is important for Pandoc. I'm not fully convinced its workable. TW differs from most Pandoc formats in having a dynamism that is significant to looks and function in a way most Pandoc formats don't have. Pandoc is largely pretty static document formats. TW can modify its own form so I'm kinda AS interested in what Pandoc can do with TW to get it into other formats as I am the other way round. I'm not yet convinced that it might not be a disappointing experience TW -> Other. I guess it would be some kinda gateway to greater uptake to TW. But I do think its a bit more complicated than it might look on first take. That's in addition to the Haskell hassle. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e2af410b-91b2-458e-8b1c-45bcde849ff9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.