On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 1:27:35 PM UTC+1, TonyM wrote: > > ... > Possibly my greatest fear is not having the ear of those who influence the > core, and the time to speak in my less than trained words about my ideas, > to such people (perhaps like yourself). >
I think your contributions are great. ... An you have the dev's ears ;) ... > You may have seen my discussions in relation to making fields first class > citizens, like tags are, when a Tag can also be a tiddler, I am already > allowing fields to be represented by a tiddler, or field-tiddlers to be > created that support many of the features your linked to in "Typed Fields" > and "lookup fields" do. I expect these to be complementary, but personally > I am not so sure typed fields are essential. I would be concerned if fields > became stricter in definition, since their openness is already a powerful > feature I am exploiting. > I think, you stumbled upon a "known" problem, where we don't have a satisfying solution atm. There have been several threads here in the group, where users wanted to have a "second" tag-like field. ... and the ActionListopsWidget is only a partial solution. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8374aef4-9e32-416f-bafe-d5f027aef874%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
