I ran the video at 1.25 speed, so might have missed something.

*Summary*

The interest was mostly about gathering and publishing references for 
published texts, which is somewhat of a niche specialty.

Three of the products were aimed at gathering references. The same 3 had 
advanced PDF handling ability. 

Evernote only offers PDF advanced handling for a premium.

There were 3 internal reference tools: Categories, Tags, Linking.

The 3 citation tools had all 3 abilities. The speaker said that Evernote 
does not have sub-categories (tags with sub-tags) but that is not true (I 
can create sub-categories on the desktop).

*Comparison with TW.*

They all had better web-scraping abilities than TW where a complete capture 
is difficult even with Tiddly Clip. 

TW has no native advanced PDF handling. In particular, no way of adding 
annotations. Possibly someone could add a field to a _canonical_uri.

TW does not have sub-category abilities, though I imagine someone could 
come up with a system of naming conventions to emulate it. I didn't watch 
the prior video to find out why you want sub-categories, but the narrator 
seemed to think they were important.

TW does not have citation reporting abilities. Data would need to be 
captured in a structured manner. Someone could write a special edition with 
specialized fields that might make that available (though rules of citation 
format are a real pain).

For the particular task of gathering, annotating, and citing references TW 
is weak out-of-the-box and in a different category. Someone might still 
prefer it due to it's portability and simplicity, especially if the final 
product can be produced with some other tool and/or citation requirements 
are not as strict. Using a tool like TiddlyClip helps also. Being able to 
create quick, relative links to local resources would be a real boon for 
research projects.

-- Mark

On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 12:54:38 AM UTC-7, Mat wrote:
>
> Nice comparison between Mendeley, Zotero, Evernote & Citavi
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKGZlfaiE0E
>
> IMO particularly worth noting things from a TW dev point of view but 
> overall interesting for info-system-geeks.
>
> <:-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/90344234-3427-49aa-9355-f9106251468f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to