See my recent post, in DIscussion https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/X6R3Nunh_KU
Reproduced here I love to hear all this talk, I am looking for the same holly-grail. [Easy save and use of TiddlyWiki] Here are some additions to the discussion. TiddleyMultiUser single executable (Jeds is brilliant, and with the improvements mentioned hear is very cool) this is even before I have exploited the MultiUser features) As jed points out you can have it running in more than one tab or browser safely, but another advantage is you can spawn multiple sessions against the one wiki, to have multiple views of the same wiki A lot more will follow TiddlyServer latest version allows folder wiki creation in the browser All it needs for single file wikis is to have the upload file make copies not overwrite, and point to a nominated list of editions A possible much neglected solution for Windows (other platform?) is renaming a single file wiki to .hta hypertext application I am also working on renaming a singlefile wiki to *.aspx to use on sharepoint (Tip save in WebPages library) NoteSelf is also very powerful allowing hosted solutions with data saved in each users browser. Wikis can subsequently be saved or have user updated plugins exported. On thought is to allow user updates to be emailed as a json file from the noteself wiki as a submission process, to be imported into a consolidated wiki. These are exciting times, and my not fully articulated dreams are coming true as new possibilities multiply, no increase exponentially. Next? Members of the community collaborating to provide services even income on top of the open platform. Regards Tony On Saturday, 10 March 2018 10:52:18 UTC+11, TonyM wrote: > > Supporting Josiahs Post > > "Yes. AND having ONE solution that works universally IMO is absolutely > essential for wider uptake" > > I would restate s > Yes. AND having ONE RELIABLE solution that works universally IMO is > absolutely essential for wider uptake. > > This in no way takes away from anyother solution. As Jeremy intimated such > Cloud Wikis could be saved as single file wikis. > > The problems?, I have considered a number of use cases to provide > accessible and rapid access tools via tiddlywiki, I have looked at every > save solution I can, even considered ways to co-opt some of these towards > my desired outcomes and every solution falls down in some way. The key > reasons are multi-user and saving/hosting. > > Global access to Tiddlywikis, optionally secured, with online update > (multiuser even if serial), in browser saves, and/or shared edits, easy to > own or fork (download), easy to accept comments (otherwise Read Only), low > cost hosting. > ..... > > All this is there in some way or other but not available as solutions, as > there are too many exceptions. > > I am building a features table tool in TiddlyWiki right now to help me > understand the TiddlyWiki save, access and Hosting ecosystems and detect > when I may be able to implement real, public and commercial solutions on > top of TiddlyWiki. > > Regards > Tony > > > > On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 5:06:49 AM UTC+11, Jed Carty wrote: >> >> About 'one way' to use tiddlywiki being desirable, >> >> One method of doing something is never going to work for everybody. Many >> of the largest problems with technology come from people in positions of >> authority insisting on that approach. Privacy on social media is a problem >> because people expect there to be one single solution and give that all the >> power. A cloud based solution may be ideal for you but it would be unusable >> for me. I am often in a position where I don't have any access to the >> internet. Having one solution is a great way to have one way that works for >> people it works for and excludes everyone else. You don't hear complaints >> about facebook on facebook because the people who it is made for use it for >> everything and never hear the people who have trouble with it because the >> 'one universal' solution isn't universal. If we do the same thing with >> tiddlywiki than the people who can use it may have a slightly better >> experience, but it would just exclude everyone who can't use that 'one way' >> instead of letting people decide on how they want to use it. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d770ab22-58b1-4bd3-a157-2390071fa63c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
