Mark S. wrote... > > So, TW checks off most of the boxes, possibly more than any other app, > though it is sometimes not as convenient as other solutions, has saving > complications, and hits performance barriers especially on mobile devices. >
Its becoming possible to wrap TW into installs where an executable handles all the saving problems. Such an approach, that more closely resembles normal software I think has great future potential for expanding TW uptake, at least on Desktops (though a dwindling part of the market). I totally agree that PERFORMANCE for at-scale work--and not just on mobile devices--is a really serious issue. I'm not good enough technically to know whether TW is hitting limits in JS running in a Browser, or whether it could be tweaked further to support "at-scale" data within its current architecture. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/73891a2e-95cf-4134-9860-d2799376883e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

