Mark S. wrote...
>
> So, TW checks off most of the boxes, possibly more than any other app, 
> though it is sometimes not as convenient as other solutions, has saving 
> complications,  and hits performance barriers especially on mobile devices.
>

Its becoming possible to wrap TW into installs where an executable handles 
all the saving problems. Such an approach, that more closely resembles 
normal software I think has great future potential for expanding TW uptake, 
at least on Desktops (though a dwindling part of the market).

I totally agree that PERFORMANCE for at-scale work--and not just on mobile 
devices--is a really serious issue. I'm not good enough technically to know 
whether TW is hitting limits in JS running in a Browser, or whether it 
could be tweaked further to support "at-scale" data within its current 
architecture. 

Best wishes
Josiah

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/73891a2e-95cf-4134-9860-d2799376883e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to