Josiah, As you say "Whilst 8,000 Tiddlers of Tweets with tags that rely on filtering gets very slow" when looking at the specific case I realised the main thing searched for was the tweet, so in a tiddlywiki for this purpose why is it a secondary fields when it could be the title. Then in None single file implementation most searching will be the title of a "skinny tiddler" only.
In TWC the goto plugin was my favourite as first you search only titles then click to search content with the advanced search. I would like to add back a title only search tool in TW5 Regards Tony On Monday, April 9, 2018 at 9:05:04 PM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao TonyM & all interested > > I do think that a "Rules Of Thumb" note on SCALABILITY could be very > useful. > > The issue is expressing it correctly. > > So much of performance is an EMPIRICAL issue, that without testing variant > use cases, you can make TW look worse than it is. That is not a good idea. > > To give an example: Whilst 8,000 Tiddlers of Tweets with tags that rely on > filtering gets very slow, a TW with addresses for 8,000 external images of > which the next displayed is calculated via a random number it is fine. In > the first case you got a lot of processing & rendering. In the second you > don't. > > To be useful guidance on Scalability I think needs informing by testing by > USE CASE. > > Best wishes > Josiah > > TonyM wrote: >> >> ... Perhaps we should start a discussion specifically on settings and >> tools for large wikis? >> >> ... When it come to scale there are a number of performance issue's, one >> of which NoteSelf solved by showing the "Loading" message before TW can >> respond at all. What I quickly realised is when you have a lot of >> tiddlers, quite a few assumptions made in a regular tiddlywiki's, for >> features and responsiveness are no longer valid. Such as a search that >> responds keystroke by keystroke. >> >> There is no reason why we can't supply some tools to support such large >> data-sets. >> > >> ... What I suggest is we bundle a range of settings together, perhaps in >> a plugin designed to reconfigure TiddlyWiki for larger data sets... >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c3f779fc-e14d-497f-80d0-0c145bd82103%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.