Hi Tony, I still wonder why we must go to such lengths to simply use a parameter or > why we must in the first place. It takes time to learn the convoluted way > is the only way. Surely we could introduce another widget or variable > reference so we can use the intuitive code patterns?
Evan Balster has been working on an extension of his "mushroom" operator that would allow in-place wikification of widget parameters (see http://evanbalster.com/tiddlywiki/formulas.html#Formulas%20as%20Tag%20Attributes). That would certainly ease the use of widgets. But don't hold your breath: merging this addition into the core would not be a simple move... Best, -- Xavier Cazin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CADeSwYM5ThATP%2BcEMk3%2BLy9E8teXgro31Jpi8u6dw_oLF11ULA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
