Mark S. wrote: > > We were told back in February that there was a new system coming that > would make contributions easier, possibly within a multi-user TW-like > environment leveraging AWS* . I wonder if that is still in the pipe-line? >
Not sure. I saw that too. Even if working I think it devolves again to the issue I was trying to get to. Which is not so much the platform as a " basic data structure" so that resource pointers can be easily used elsewhere. The problem with Toolmap is that it is (1) Proprietary and (2) Maintained > by a single person. > Dynalink does support OPML export. TiddlyToolmap is fairly undifferentiated internally. Its basically a simple OPML style outline. One thing per line within a "tag" organised system. Its overall structure's simplicity has up-sides. > Problem (2) is the same as with the current GitHub solution. It's also > unclear what I should be submitting. > > If I make a small macro or filter to help someone out, should I be > bothering David about it? > Right. David has mainly concentrated on replete plugins. They are easier to spot and tend to a "finished package" that is more identifiable. David does not have time or resources to test or go into detail. As far as I understand it he benefits if people are mainly "plugin spotting" in case he misses one. Regarding Mark S. work ... some of it is definitely worth bothering about. I know personally you made some solutions, partly in response to me, that were really excellent and well polished. I'm thinking of the tweaking you did of Riz' "TW Tweet Saver" that auto converts in-line #hastags in Tiddlers used to create and post to Twitter to TW tags on save. And the "HTML Snapshot" that captures the rendered HTML of a Tiddler and creates a new pure HTML Tiddler from that. Very useful small tools ... And Many, Many More ... That said, I want to underline again what David is doing is immensely helpful. What I did not realise till recently is he has done such "cataloguing" before for TWC at TiddlyVault <http://tiddlyvault.tiddlyspot.com/>. > I think the best ultimate solution would be a MediaWiki type wiki > environment where multiple individuals can contribute. > Right. My thought was to see if there are ways we can garner and utilise his data already. Part of a step towards that kind of idea... or anything else that can take an import of records with fields. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/97e53717-5491-496b-8742-8a73fa28252c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
