Yeah, proper security would be nice. Alas, tanstaafl. Although a system with all of the above is ideal, your plan for Bob is already great. It's beyond what I thought would be free to use. Thanks :)
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 1:20:19 AM UTC+9, Jed Carty wrote: > > Bob is never going to be secure in the way that you would want online, but > I am working on an express-based backend server that works with Bob and has > proper security. It is actually what the demo wiki I am currently using is > being served on. It needs a server that can run node but it should be fine > on something like one of the cheaper digital ocean droplets. > > I am currently adding polish to it and then I need to do another security > audit before I release the code. I hope that is soon because I have another > project that I want to get to work on. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a8cf6eaa-a501-4550-9f50-90e771489cd7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
