UPDATE: This replaces a post I inadvertently sent out before it was finished.
Ciao TheDiveO I had a closer look at the plugin. It looks interesting. I'm going to see if I can optimise the JSON for a specific use case where I have a lot of tiddlers where only the text field is important. I'm not done on that yet. What I have noticed playing the settings ... 1 - Quite small changes in the settings can have quite big effects on results. That might make it very good for tuning for some situations. 2 - I think to test it properly you need a fairly large set of data that is consistent in some way (like its all plain text and all text fields about the same length). Just for test purposes. But it gets easier to understand what its doing I think. 3 - Out-of-the-box good it is good at coping with spelling errors; and automating adding plurals when you search for only the singular. For some use cases, like, for instance searching literary fiction, that is very useful indeed. Best, Josiah TheDiveO wrote:That's what I suspect; to make it match less, I turned down(!!!) the threshold option value to 0.35; YMMV. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/db119c33-5ee3-46af-8e7a-b1dc7704a46c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
