interesting response you've missed the objective of the purpose of a logo - which is primarily
the identifier face of a company or product - and to create a subliminal link between thelogo/icon and the brand name. it is neant to have a RECOGNITION FACTOR which is not delivered by the look or functionality of a webpage if that WAS the case then you'd identify this top 20 globalwebsite in an instant - which i am sure 90% + would not ( i am confident about that having just tested it by blurring only 2 small parts of the home page . 10% recognition factor isn't branding Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Aug 2018, at 4:05 am, bimlas <[email protected]> wrote: > > The logo (at least some kind of it) is shown only on the last two. While > viewing these sites, did you looked at the logo of the site itself? I don't > think so. How do you recognize a site? I think the colors and the shape, the > overall design gives more "personality" to a website than an "avatar", an > icon. I absolutely agree with Jeremy that Tiddly needs design improvements > instead of replacing an image what you see in very rare times. If a newcomer > wants to know Tiddly, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3F7D4616-A286-4422-B172-4078F57D67B6%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
