Ciao bimlas & all interested I think the whole issue of support for other markup systems is very interesting. And important. Important not least because it could really expand the user-base if we had more flex on that.
I want to point out that JS library solutions MIGHT be compatible with normal TW content type. I think the issue is about "order of changes." BJ did great work on this that illustrates its possible to have an approach that runs as a "pre-parser" and THEN selectively enable the additional rules in the normal TW content type. Personally I only used this method to run "pre-parsing" through raw regular expressions ... That is the first pass, then there is a second pass that lets TW use its normal content type. BJ's core work on this is here & is likely worth a look: http://bjtools.tiddlyspot.com/#Flexitype%20Demos. Its worth looking if only to better understand fundamental TW parsing. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c9cda0dc-3709-45e9-8eb1-ec649785e3d2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
