Basically, writers are more interested on content than mechanism. I often have hot sweats over whether I should include Bucket's Theorom or just go for a saying of Crusoe *(Crusoe says to Crusoe, "Crusoe you should say 'Crusoe'".)*
h0p3 I really like your writing which is both tech-jiggled and wanting to get to the point. I sometimes think we could help writers by giving more examples of writing in TW? Best wishes J. h0p3 wrote: > > Agreed. I'm always trying to convince the writers I know to give TW a > spin, and this is one of those simple mechanics which turn out to be super > useful. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/39119f02-770f-42da-8d69-5f69ee45ddba%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
