On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 3:32:35 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: ....
> -- Makes transport and archiving of Tiddlers a flexible, clear & clean > process. I found it very robust and easy to use. The way it integrates into > the UI is good too. > Thx. > -- It is increasingly needed as TW is growing add-ons, plugins, macro > bits, CSS tweaks etc at a fast rate. Just keeping track of good things can > be a major hassle. To gave an example, when I set-up a new TW, depending > on its usage requirements, I drag and drop up to 9 bundles according to > what is needed. If I did that item by item for the components the bundles > now hold if would take hours to locate them all, even if I could remember > them. > That's a usecase, I didn't see at the beginning. For me the first usecase was, to create "proof of concepts" + some docs, that a user can easily include ... AND .. delete, after the tiddlers are not used anymore. > There are two issues I mentioned before in some of the early threads on > the bundler which I still hope you might be able to address? > > 1 -- *Have a way of adding comments in Bundler Lists* such that it does > not throw the count off. I found comments essential to have in complex > bundles so you can see at a glance what they contain. Currently I use a > pseudo Tiddler title like [[--- Comment Here ---]] to do that. But it > throws the count off. If I could have only one request dealt with it would > be for this :-). > I was thinking about that, some time ago. ... The TW .multids-like structure may be an option to store comments. The .multids parser already understands them. So we could re-use existing code, without too many modifications. .multids files are part of eg: languages <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/tree/master/languages/de-DE>. ... If a line starts with a hash sign: # ... it will be treated as a comment. The problem I saw, was, that we already have 2 formats, that do very similar things: DataTiddlers <https://tiddlywiki.com/#DataTiddlers>: - JSON tiddlers <https://tiddlywiki.com/#JSONTiddlers> - Dictionary tiddlers <https://tiddlywiki.com/#DictionaryTiddlers> JSON tiddlers don't allow comments, because of the specs. Dictionary tiddlers are very similar to .multids, but lack comments and the internal API isn't easy to use. ... I didn't want to create a 3rd format. IMO a bit more thoughts may be needed. 2 -- I still wonder if there is a way that a Bundle List could have *a > "destroy mode" *such that, for instance, a list would appear with > checkboxes next to each item allowing deletion when in destroy mode? Even > better a "select all" too? Something like that. > Like an "uninstall-button" :) ... Yea, if you have 9 bundles with several tiddlers installed, it can be quite challenge to uninstall them. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4fef51fe-0533-43b8-8444-3ae77ff6cb26%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
