Thanks, but when I plug that in to the above filter (replacing the former) it doesn't work (nothing is returned)
On Monday, October 22, 2018 at 8:10:00 AM UTC-6, Jed Carty wrote: > > I am looking at making an intersects operator similar to the contains > operator that lets you give a list of values instead and returns the > tiddler if any values from the argument match any in the field of the input > tiddler. > > But since that doesn't exist yet you can use de morgan's law: > > A or B or C ... => !A and !B and !C ... > > so you can make your filter: > > [all[current]!title[FrontPage]]-[!tag[work]!tag[errands]] > > and if you add more tags you continue the second part like this: > > [all[current]!title[FrontPage]]-[!tag[work]!tag[errands]!tag[foo]!tag[bar > ]] > > I made a wiki that has some examples of how to translate logic statement > to filters that may help a bit. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c5e70647-51e4-4b21-a501-de10b6092f31%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
