> > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> It's semi-documented. It was documented enough for me to know it was >> important. >> > Mask S. asked ...
> Where exactly is it "semi-documented" ? > When someone asks "exactly" I know I need to come to attention :-). I tend to use https://github.com/OokTech/TW5-Bob/blob/master/Configuration.md which does include it. Its a kind of Bible of Bob. But having to have all your images in one location, no matter how you divvy > that location up, is what's limiting. > I agree. My take is its about making the best of that. I think its a limit on node derivation? With plain TW, or TW with tiddlyserver, your files can be somewhere in > respect to your TW location, no matter where it is. That way you can zip up > the contents of a directory and have all the information that's required to > make a complete TW-eco system. I agree. The files "in the other place" is awkward on export from Bob. It requires clear planning in advance or you can get in a mess. You can't just press a button and do it auto. On the other hand Bob scripts can ameliorate the issue somewhat (like quite easy "copy" via OS from and to). But the "virtual" addressing in the wiki itself still needs fixing (i.e. "./f/img/fred.jpg" -> "./img/fred.jpg") when you export to singular. Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d5c15579-bb10-4db5-853a-34cafbd42fa4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
