Hi Linda, You might find the "[all[missing]]" filter useful for this, combined with "+[backlinks[]]" to get the tiddlers linking to each missing tiddler. There might be a smarter way to filter out missing tiddlers with only one reference, but I would probably use "[butfirst[]]" to find tiddlers with more than one reference. As far as sorting by count goes, I don't have any ideas, but maybe http://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins/#filter would be helpful!
-Rob On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 12:04:55 AM UTC-5, Linda Moss wrote: > > Is there a way I can list all missing tiddlers, that shows a count of how > many references there are to the missing tiddler, and sort the list by the > count descending? (even better if I can give it a cut-off, such as not > listing missing tiddlers with only a single reference). > > I've got a 12-megabyte tiddly-wiki in which I've frequently included links > to things that don't exist yet but that I plan to add. (Also, I make a lot > of typos). As a result, my "missing tiddlers" list is currently far too > long to be useful. When doing wiki maintenance, I'd love to be able to > focus on the most-referenced missing tiddlers. Is this possible? > > Thanks! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c9e69c69-7f83-4f8b-a741-069b0f9452b6%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
