Ciao PMario Thanks for the detail!
You very much address my cruder points in a more elegant way! And you, basically, say somewhat the same: with "closed but valid". *That is pretty much what I meant.* BUT, still there is WHO would do the flagging? I don't like the idea its just you. Its a burden. On the other hand WHO has the competence to know? I know I don't for other than a few things. Many thanks Josiah PMario wrote ... > As I wrote. There are many issues, that still have value. *A different > way, to remember them,* would be to create 3 meta-issues. > > eg: > > 1) new-features - closed but still valid > 2) improvements - closed but still valid > 3) discussions > > Those 3 meta-issues will be always Open > > Possible and simple workflow > > a) Meta-issues 1,2,3 contain some description, AND a link like: > improvement > <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aimprovement> > b) If an issue with label 1,2,3 are open longer than 1 year, they will be > closed with a reference to the meta-issue > c) Some issues may be closed, because they are outdated, not actionable > ... > They don't get the link to meta issues. > > If an issue is closed with b), github will automatically create a link to > the meta-issue and a backlink to the issue, that will be closed. With this > mechanism it is easy to follow the trails. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/29aa887a-77dc-4d9a-b46e-76171912749e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
