We're in somewhat similar shoes. A cryptographically signable single html file is always my product. After two years of just working on the single-file (using browser extensions to save), I'm taking another look at splitting up my development environment from the product itself (while maintaining the ability to effortlessly switch back to my battle-tested single-file editing mode). I require my browser extensions to productively work on my wiki; Grammarly has been a very useful tool in editing my wiki (my grammar is often awful).
The game changer for me is Bob's bi-directional input from .tid and browser. I'm going to be testing (and likely benchmarking) whatever methods there are for compiling the .tid files into a single file (and I'm willing to look at convoluted answers). I'm not sure if there is a simple or performant answer here, but I'm looking for one. I'd like to compile every minute for my toolchain, but I've found compilation (and decompilation) to be computationally expensive (although it's been a while since I've done it). I want to edit in my browser using a Bob server and have the single-file product automatically generated and distributed for me (with a cherry on top). This is my current insane approach (there has to be a better way!): https://philosopher.life/#Wiki%3A%20Rube-Goldberg%20Machine:%5B%5BWiki%3A%20Rube-Goldberg%20Machine%5D%5D I'll let you know how it goes if you're interested, especially if I find a clean way to have your cake and eat it too. On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 2:17:58 PM UTC-5, Captain Packers wrote: > > I'm creating some distributable documentation in TiddlyWiki and faced with > a dilemma. > > The dilemma is the seemingly mutually exclusive but highly desirable > features of the need for spell checking, ease of use with regard to saving, > and generating an easily distributed self-contained wiki in a single html > file. > > I like TiddlyDesktop because it creates a self-contained wiki in an easy > to distribute, single html file. But I don't want to distribute a product > with a lot of spelling errors. > > I also like node.js tiddlywiki because it uses the built in spell checking > of the browser, but I don't think conversion to a single file html file is > simple or straightforward. > > Sure wish the simplicity of these two could somehow be combined. > > I'm wondering what folks are doing as a work around the this dilemma. > > Appreciate any feedback > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f8a54627-0e99-4eec-b266-802618b3d404%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
