Ciao Jed. I see feedback is a problem. I wish more people would just say their experience. Bob is brilliant. The underlying mechanism is fantastic. The end utility broadens the TW project enormously.
My hesitation on serving online are merely I am an idiot and nervous about doing it badly. Concerning the OP re the plugin library mechanism .... TBH I'm not fully sure of the added value. Its not so much the mechanism, which looks great and works ... its more about the larger question of access to resources ... The scope of TiddlyToolmap, in practice, suits me for *finding things* even though its a bit cumbersome on finding the actual installs. In short, what is the scope of a plugin library and what are its aims? Something like that. Best wishes Josiah On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 14:37:04 UTC+1, Jed Carty wrote: > > I have been ignoring this group for a while but there seemed to be a lot > of interest in an alternate plugin library architecture that would make > adding to it easier but I have had almost no feedback about it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1e0956e3-590c-47a8-aa71-f3c37ec1f75a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
