Hello Mark, I like to have Olegh comments, as he has better experiences in using TW for scientific contents. But I think
- A tiddler should have its own numbering starting from 1 - When we make a big tiddler by transcluding small tiddlers, the macro should take care of correct numbering starting from 1 (this is what you said. the first appeared is first) - If a reference deleted in a text, the tiddler should be dynamically update the numbers BTW, I would like to thank you for your work. I think what you did e.g. each reference has a tiddler is a great idea! This give us huge flexibility. The only problem is here the wiki soon get crowded with reference tiddlers. - Mohammad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a4895086-a4b1-4133-8685-eb0b198c75bc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
