Hey all, Thanks for you replies - I agree that TW is different/better/more powerful/flexible, etc than the "competition" I've posted. My point was not lets copy their features, but lets study:
- How they present their features - Which ones appeal to larger groups of people - How they get exposure to different groups - etc I want TW to be bigger, more well known, and EASIER TO BEGIN. Many "competitors" of TW have all three of these going for them On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 8:25:22 AM UTC-6, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Yeah > > Where do I find those distinctions in the wild? > > Such that a seeker could find their gold? > > Looking for the one > Josiah > > On Monday, 7 January 2019 13:31:10 UTC+1, TonyM wrote: >> >> Josiah, >> >> As I have voiced previously on the subject of wiki the name and meaning >> issue, the easiest solution is to refer where ever possible to the >> "Tiddlywiki platform" And insert between these two words the following as >> appropriate; >> >> Application >> Note >> Website >> Database >> Mobile >> >> Because it is all of these and more. >> >> Relegate tiddlywiki to the name and let platform suggest its capacity. >> >> Regards >> Tony >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/704aa6d5-c7a0-49f8-ba92-d5c99e80c37c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
