Nice plugin Riz,

 It shows a confirmation window to export every tiddler, how to restrict 
this to only one time confirmation window?

Cheers
Mohammad

On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 7:24:30 PM UTC+3:30, Riz wrote:
>
> Still seems to be no way to generate single static pages for each Tiddly 
>> aside from the convoluted Node.js method via the command line
>>
>
> If I understand correctly, you want to export multiple tiddlers from your 
> standalone Tiddlywiki to separate Html files, the same way static site 
> generators do. 
>  I am attaching a plugin called staticExporter macro. Drag and drop it to 
> your standalone Tiddlywiki, refresh the wiki. Now use it like this.
>
> <$button actions=<<staticExporter "[tag[HelloThere]]">>> 
> Export all tiddlers tagged HelloThere to separate HTML files. 
> </$button>
>
>
>
>
> You can read more about it in the readme section of the plugin.
>
>
>
>     Javascript-based tag pills do not work in exported static HTML page.
>>
>
> You mean, if you click on it, the drop-down showing "other tiddlers with 
> same tag" is not appearing? I haven't done it myself either, but I have an 
> inkling that this is also possible. Of course you'll have to tweak the 
> template and link to a copy of external-js of Tiddlywiki, and create a 
> static list. Difficult, probably time consuming, but possible I guess. 
>
>     "Feature creep" – TW is getting more and more features added to it, 
>> which is adding to the basic file size.
>>
>
> I understand this and voice the same opinion. A number of things in the 
> recent editions should have been official plugins. What I usually do is, 
> when a new version come out, I git clone it to a local folder, remove the 
> unnecessary things, add the stuff I use regularly, build it to an empty 
> standalone file and use that thereafter, instead of downloading standalone 
> html from Tiddlywiki.com
>
>
>
>     I want to use TW as simply as possible, in its original intent – as a 
>> browser-based program. I have my browser open all the time when on my PC, 
>> and it is very convenient to switch a tab to my TW, rather than the other 
>> methods of using it via a server, or a stand-alone program such as 
>> Tiddlydesktop. Will TW be able to be used like this into the future?
>>
>
>
> Have you met Timimi <https://ibnishak.github.io/Timimi/> ?
>
>     
>
>
>
> Despite my trepidations, I still like the program and want to be able to 
>> use it (have to admit that I spend a bit of time "playing" with it!). I 
>> still have not found the "one program to rule them all" when it comes to 
>> writing and recording my data and creative work, but TW has a lot of 
>> elements I like. (Dokuwiki is another wiki I like, but it is more complex 
>> and requires a server to function.) The community around it is also 
>> welcoming and friendly!
>>
>
> I have tried out dozens of softwares out there in search of a perfect tool 
> for building my personal knowledge base. I set the following criteria.
>
> - FOSS
> - Offline first 
> - Tweakable
> - Scalable
> - Cross platform.
>
> In my experience, Tiddlywiki is second only to org mode for the purpose. 
> But then, there will be always org mode. It is unfair to any note taking 
> software to be  compared to  org-freakin-mode,  which enjoys the full 
> hearted support of an ecosystem build by Richard St. Ignucious Stallman 
> himself in C, and is extensible by the language of gods. I heard that they 
> are even porting it to rust to enable multi threading. My point is, the 
> apples and oranges comparison aside, Tiddlywiki is your best bet if you are 
> not an org mode fan. 
>
> sincerely,
> Riz
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4fb3e01a-f1f7-4488-9ed2-d06d0b56c2a0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to