Mohammad, I started playing with it and my guess performance opening is related to tiddler size, and performance running depends on what is encoded in the html, so not much overhead.
This feature should allow using tiddlywiki as a html design, build and test environment (and host/serve). We then could use a bulk export to hosting. I am keen to play with html javascript solutions that abound on the internet and open source environment. I have joined and initiated a number of conversations on related issues recently. Watch this space Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/481f8108-86d8-494c-a22d-2fdda01f2dda%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
