Bimlas, Thanks for your answers. It is good that disqus is seperate entirely because it allows it to be used independantly of the savability of the wiki. So hosting a single file wiki on any basic server can have interaction.
I understand it does not match the tiddlywiki philosopy but I am not sure it is relavent since if it is public on the internet and you want to allow comments it does not compromise anything. Reading wikipedia it does raise some issues. When and where do you think we may see advertising? I think this may be a very good solution to opening wikis to interaction, however I am confident some people may not like the disqus reputation. It makes me wonder if there are other microblogging solutions we can host ourselves and intergrate with tiddlywiki like you have. I wonder if there are any we can attach tids or jsons to? Good work, again Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f450fe6c-4ea9-4387-82c2-a58ba3078306%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
