Ciao M. and all, IMO global search and replace needs *Live Feedback* to user to use safely. And *Undo* if at all possible.
What Mohammad achieved in TC is amazing but lacks feedback to know what happened. Wide live replace is dangerous if you not fully clear what you are doing. I wonder if we could "back-up" that process so its reversible? Josiah On Monday, 25 February 2019 20:23:09 UTC+1, Mohammad wrote: > > > With the advent of new string filters, it is time to add the > search-and-replace filter too. Also see here > > #3288 > > A proposal could be like below > > `[searchreplace:filed:flag[<sVal>,<rVal>]` > > This can be quite similar to current search filter operator. > > * field: any filed, like text > * flag: words (for whole words), casesensitive,... > * sVal: search value > * rVal: replace value > > This can also be used with diff widget to show the changes. > Worth to see BTC script here: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/9WhnnIktuKA/Xmcd4nWfAQAJ > > > See also GitHub Issue: > https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/3803 > > Cheers > Mohammad > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5170118c-9be2-4633-92a2-93d416927874%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
