S S

Did you use the actual subfilter operator?

I would like to chase this to an elegant and adaptable method, because it 
is important.

Regards
Tony

On Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 9:31:58 AM UTC+11, S. S. wrote:
>
> Tony, your suggestion is close. What it tells me is if <myfilter> 
> *contains* {!!list} - which is actually also useful to me!
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 4:42:31 AM UTC+7, TonyM wrote:
>>
>> S s
>>
>> A possible trick, in a filter generate the titles in one and remove the 
>> title found in the other. Emptyvalue or emptymessage will mean a match, 
>> including when both are empty.
>>
>> If not empty The result will be tiddlers not found in either list. 
>>
>> To simplify it use the subfilter operator for both sets of tiddler and 
>> try -[subfilter[name]
>>
>> Eg untested
>> "[subfilter<myfilter>] -[subfilter{!!list}]"
>>
>> Regards
>> Tony
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9bc91a42-105d-4000-ac91-3fdfac6d5676%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to