Diego Mesa wrote: > > In my mind, an "undo function" is synonymous with "version control". >
I agree. Kinda. Though likely more short term than normal VC. Mohammad wrote: > But I am afraid duplication tiddlers in this way will result in huge file >> size. >> > I agree it would *if it were persistent*. I'm thinking more of cloning of just a "start version" that persists only as long as you doing the replace. That when you finish and happy ts deleted? Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b7df602c-cac0-45a1-aba4-5bbaf79648c0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
