I read that as In addition to the existing tiddlers add to the list tiddlers that are not missing. I think is missing is miss used here. is[missing]] cant start a run, so I expect neither can !is[missing]
>From tiddlywiki.com missing does not exist (other than possibly as a shadow tiddler), regardless of whether there are any links to it !is[tiddler] is a synonym for is[missing], and vice versa. When is[missing] is the first operator in a run <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Run>, its output is always empty. And when is[shadow] comes first, it outputs only those shadow tiddlers that have been overridden. This is because the initial input to a run <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Expression> contains only *non*-shadow tiddlers. Regards Tony On Saturday, March 23, 2019 at 9:21:46 PM UTC+11, Mohammad wrote: > > Why shadow toddlers are missing tiddlers? > By accident I realised a filter output of shadows when fed the > +[!is[missing]] return empty output, why? > > Mohammad > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/583eeacb-5ae1-422f-b8b8-1996177bb184%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
