Ciao Mark S. & S.S. & all, Mark S. wrote: > > That would be an excellent tag. I feel the tags we're given are too vague. >
Right. If a tag is too broad you just revert back to the problem of overwhelm. The google search page doesn't give you any help by telling you what tags > to use. > Right. The issue isn't just assigning them---its how to use them to help filter. So *how?* S. S. wrote: > >> Imagine if I had tagged this post: A quiet Date >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/_bbDpiiReic/ZgA1N6g9CQAJ> : >> with a tag like *regex* - I'm sure it would have caught your attention! >> > Right. Nice catch. "Regex" seems like a good tag in preciser scope! My issue is I never see people's tags in normal reading mode. I can't tell visually if the post has a tag or not. You have filter by Tag button (top right), but then you don't see relevant untagged posts. And the filtered list you see can be very long. Its a mess :-) Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d079b4ef-fea3-41b3-979e-73e197edfad4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
