Ciao Mark S. Its interesting to note that historical accounting of dates in the past was extremely accurate manually--and despite different date systems that were common until Julian dates converged with Gregorian. Social historians can largely rely they are accurate.
The idea of "the copy" is fascinating. Now its a doddle. *Then* is was a serious project. ... From scribe to mimeograph to photocopy to scan to* its never analogue*. Side note Josiah On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 19:05:16 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > Carbon paper gave (gives, no technology ever goes away completely*) better > results, was re-usable, and correctable. > > * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7954936-what-technology-wants > > On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 8:52:38 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvTxutSuw-I&feature=youtu.be >> >> I sit in the dark waiting for a tall handsome PDF for NCR paper. >> >> Abreast of the latest Teape ideas >> @TiddlyTweeter >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1f2630f6-d293-4f3b-a949-95bb86d66041%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
