On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 12:19:51 PM UTC-7, Aidan Grey wrote: > > > As to atomization - I already tried that and got halfway in before I > realized it wouldn't work for me. It gets complicated: > > Go 1 > 1. Intransitive Verb: move; attack; be known; empty the bladder or bowels > 2. Transitive Verb: afford; proceed along > 3. Noun: act of going; a turn > 4. Adjective: functioning properly and ready (all systems go) > > Go 2 > 1. Noun: Japanese board game > > For me, that's 2 separate tiddlers, one for the english word go, one for > the japanese word borrowed into english > > Yes -- those are two different words that happen to share a similar sound.. You could use the caption or description field so that they could share the title "Go" for sorting and searching.
Actually Go 1 would need to be split into each meaning. (Go (bodily function), Go (movement), Go (turn)...) One for each entry in a good dictionary -- assuming that you will want to use the data in some manner. But sometimes it's better to work backwards. What outputs do you want? How do you expect to use this data? If you could hide tags, what tags would you hide? Hmm. Will your polysynthetic language have a single word that indicates all those things? Are these words you will be constructing? Or are you trying to classify existing words? Good luck! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cbbb418b-2edf-4894-9ac8-740f1f19ffdc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
