Mat, I expect it would suffice. I assume that is an equivalent for equal or prefix[one]suffixe[one]]?
There is a bit of a barrier to all users using regexp. What would be nice is if some of the common ones like you demonstrated were documented for general users to use. Especially for the cases where it helps address a shortcoming. If you know regex well I could generate a list of desirable tests for you to match? Regards Tony On Sunday, July 28, 2019 at 10:05:33 AM UTC+10, Mat wrote: > > Interesting pattern. should be useful. > > If we ever get an equals[] operator this would become >> [<__x__>equals[one]] >> Not real yet :) >> > > Would regexp[^one$] suffice? > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5e1cec14-6ebe-4fb0-b0e1-71e2765537dd%40googlegroups.com.
