Yes, I though these may be the essential tools, but some may be useless for some users like KaTeX.
--Mohammad On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 4:20:57 PM UTC+4:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Mohammad > > I definitely think that complete apps is a very good way to go. > > For end users not so interested in endless add-ons they have to find I > think it could make a big difference. > > I doubt it makes any significant downgrade in performance having a bunch > of things included they might never use. > > The point is having utility present they will use. > > Best wishes > TT > > > > On Thursday, 8 August 2019 13:34:54 UTC+2, Mohammad wrote: >> >> Many thanks Josiah! >> >> I am working on that and hopefully I will release an edition (I prefer to >> call it app) include some handy plugins. >> >> >> 1. Trashbin >> 2. Todolist >> 3. Commander >> 4. Shiraz >> 5. Semantic colors >> 6. Timelines >> 7. Favorites >> >> And include some other from TW developers. >> >> Cheers >> Mohammad >> >> >> On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 2:06:01 PM UTC+4:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> Very good piece of work! >>> >>> It would be very interesting if you ever* brought into one >>> plugin/system all your innovations with *visuality* in TW*. >>> >>> I think you are addressing fundamental issues of "informational >>> representation". >>> >>> In many ways, better *visual* representation is more important in uptake >>> of use of TW than the more arcane--those that know--development of filters. >>> >>> What we lack is *integration*. Why should a user need to find 7 plugins >>> on presentation when ONE will do the job? >>> >>> Just thoughts >>> Josiah >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ea400e35-a429-4423-b3e8-c19472c185d7%40googlegroups.com.
