> > Mark S. wrote: >> >> especially in the context of USB testing, that you might >> > want to try some larger files to give a more realistic experience. >> > @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
Right. I overlooked that so far! > > Now there is testing structure I'll make a "Performance" version as it > will be easy. > The gory details of a serious performance check are here: https://github.com/Marxsal/polly/issues/2 Polly performed well on this basic challenge test (8 wiki updated every 10 seconds; restore process running every 3 seconds) from a USB stick. Hence also the random thoughts about robocopy, which is supposedly more >> robust than standard copy, but actually I don't know if it's more robust >> than >> the copy function built into PS. >> > I don't think RoboCopy is needed. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/30bade49-9983-4d1b-8c20-be526ebfc83a%40googlegroups.com.
