I think we need an edition for publishing and demos of people plugins and 
macros. This could be extended to support software in general.

If I may take this opportunity to point out the idea with Polly to use a 
restore method to build browser independant saving is sheer genius. However to 
use "restore" as a way to describe it is from my perspective not good. Why ? 
Because despite all the backups available to me I rarely ever need to restore. 
On the surface this makes Polly look like something I am unlikely to use, and 
this shortchanges what Polly can do.

Perhaps saving wikis from any browser without add-ons or server installs is a 
better description. In Polly s design restore is effectively how one saves. So 
I suggest calling it save and keep the word restore for the technical summary.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To view this discussion on the web visit

Reply via email to