Josiah I think we need an edition for publishing and demos of people plugins and macros. This could be extended to support software in general.
If I may take this opportunity to point out the idea with Polly to use a restore method to build browser independant saving is sheer genius. However to use "restore" as a way to describe it is from my perspective not good. Why ? Because despite all the backups available to me I rarely ever need to restore. On the surface this makes Polly look like something I am unlikely to use, and this shortchanges what Polly can do. Perhaps saving wikis from any browser without add-ons or server installs is a better description. In Polly s design restore is effectively how one saves. So I suggest calling it save and keep the word restore for the technical summary. Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/df4dc8db-3cf0-4035-b6d8-973f70be365e%40googlegroups.com.